I suggest that you do the area around my house. I've been adding Karlsruhe-style addressing ways, but with all of the houses marked with addr:housenumber and building=yes. Where neither the mailbox nor the house have a number I've added a node with just building=yes. I'm at 44.73 -74.94.
My ways are as accurate as you can get with a GPS receiver on a bicycle riding at 12MPH, so they should serve as a good quality- control test. -russ On May 26, 2009, at 3:02 PM, Theodore Book wrote: > I think I will go ahead and do a mock-up of a conversion script that > creates the secondary ways. I was also thinking about the best way to > create the extra ways for areas where we aren't replacing the tiger > data. Perhaps would be possible to generate the address ways from the > raw tiger data, where the ways haven't been combined, and then only > upload them if the original ways haven't been modified. It might then > be possible to create new address ways for the ways that had been > modified. I will stick to the first part of the project for now, > though. > > TB > > > Alan Millar wrote: > >> I had the same thoughts on the Karlsruhe schema. Having 3 ways for >> street >> and address interpolation does seem complex. But when I look at >> OSM areas >> mapped using it, and also recall problems I've encountered with >> geocoding, >> I think the Karlsruhe -- Russ Nelson - http://community.cloudmade.com/blog - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:RussNelson r...@cloudmade.com - Twitter: Russ_OSM - http://openstreetmap.org/user/RussNelson _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us