Either method should work for routing software. I tend to prefer the single relation with roles since it is more succinct and editors fully support roles now. It becomes easier to associate the 2 ways as a route without needing a super-relation to tie them together as one (if that were to become necessary).
-------------------------------------------------- From: "Richard Welty" <rwe...@averillpark.net> Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 10:06 AM To: <talk-us@openstreetmap.org> Subject: [Talk-us] question: relations & divided highways > i'm wondering which of the following methods is preferred for the > westbound leg: > > 1) same relation, set role to west > > 2) different relation for west bound. > > i can go either way right now with no real difference in the amount of > work. i'm just wondering > what is considered preferable. i do see that there are a couple of other > relations for segments of > I-90 kicking around, which seem to be one relation for both directions, > perhaps this is a clue that > i should go with option 1 above. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us