given that there is apparent concensus that Interstate relations be done on a state-by-state basis, perhaps the language on the Interstate_Highways_Relations page should be updated:
Avoid relation proliferation, if possible. If a relation already exists for the route you are tagging, you can reuse the existing relation in your area. In Potlatch, do a relation search on the existing relation's number. perhaps should become: Avoid relation proliferation, if possible. Interstate Highway relations should be on a state-by-state basis, e.g. I-90 in MA, I-90 in NY, I-90 in PA, and so forth. If a suitable relation already exists for the route you are tagging, you can reuse the existing relation in your area. In Potlatch, do a relation search on the existing relation's number. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
