this is an old topic on talk and never a final agreement. changing the wiki might create big discussions I agree with your definition and use it the same way.
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Val Kartchner <val...@gmail.com> wrote: > The descriptions on the wiki are quite ambiguous as to when to use path, > track, cycleway, footway or bridleway. There aren't any places around > here that I've tagged as bridleway, so I'll leave that one alone for > now. Otherwise, here is the criteria that I have been using: > > Path: Unpaved, narrow way in the foothills or mountains. > Track: Unpaved, way wide enough for a vehicle. > Cycleway: Paved, usually urban and asphault, way designated for use by > bicycles. > Footway: Paved, usually concrete, way designated primarily for use by > pedestrians. > > Are these good definitions? If so, let's modify the wiki to be > unambiguous. > > - Val - > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
