On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 12:05 -0400, Richard Weait wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM, McGuire, Matthew > <matt.mcgu...@metc.state.mn.us> wrote: > > Does anyone know the percentage of OSM data that is imported vs mapped in > > the US? How does this compare to other countries? > > When TIGER was imported it dominated the database and contributed data > from all countries combined. The US community is growing and > individual contributions are growing, but so are imports from other > sources.
In Oregon, 48% of the objects have been most recently modified by non-TIGER sources. Calculated this way: grep -o 'user="[a-zA-Z0-9]*"' oregon.osm | sort | uniq -c | sort -n | grep -vi tiger | awk '{sum += $1} END { print sum;}' grep -o 'user="[a-zA-Z0-9]*"' oregon.osm | sort | uniq -c | sort -n | awk '{sum += $1} END { print sum;}' It's higher than I expected, personally. Not too shabby. -- Dave _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us