Using the same command on CloudMade's pennsylvania.osm, I get 1092728/1685382, i.e. 65%.
—Sven On 23-Jun-10, at 12:12 , Dave Hansen wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 12:05 -0400, Richard Weait wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM, McGuire, Matthew >> <matt.mcgu...@metc.state.mn.us> wrote: >>> Does anyone know the percentage of OSM data that is imported vs >>> mapped in >>> the US? How does this compare to other countries? >> >> When TIGER was imported it dominated the database and contributed >> data >> from all countries combined. The US community is growing and >> individual contributions are growing, but so are imports from other >> sources. > > In Oregon, 48% of the objects have been most recently modified by > non-TIGER sources. Calculated this way: > > grep -o 'user="[a-zA-Z0-9]*"' oregon.osm | sort | uniq -c | sort -n > | grep -vi tiger | awk '{sum += $1} END { print sum;}' > grep -o 'user="[a-zA-Z0-9]*"' oregon.osm | sort | uniq -c | sort -n > | awk '{sum += $1} END { print sum;}' > > It's higher than I expected, personally. Not too shabby. > > -- Dave > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us