On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:11 PM, andrzej zaborowski <balr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 31 July 2010 00:50, Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 6:36 PM, andrzej zaborowski <balr...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> Also note that once there's a photo on flickr that is tagged with an
>>> osm object id and a foursquare.com venue id at the same time, you have
>>> a link between OSM and foursquare.com, no need to duplicate this
>>> information in either of these databases.  If that osm object contains
>>> a tiger tlid, you can tie the foursquare.com venue to a tiger record
>>> and so on.
>>
>> Serious question: why would anyone want to do this? (putting aside the
>> fact that foursquare is probably not for streets) Does the TLID have
>> any significance outside TIGER?
>
> Various use cases I can see right now, and there are more.
>  * You may just want to display a link to the osm object or tiger
> object on a flickr photo page (flickr already does it for photos
> tagged with osm:<node|way|relation>= ), the service may even
> automatically extract metadata from either of the databases, like
> "this is a building", "this is a road", so even the computer can know
> what exactly is on the photo, no need to analyse the picture.  Google
> could use it to enhance picture search etc.  OSM gives you some
> information on the object, TIGER gives you other type of information
> (official classification, weird area codes etc), another database
> (like foursquare.com? not sure) can tell you the capacity of a bar and
> maybe even price level for a restaurant that's a node in OSM.
>  * knowing which direction the camera looked, you can actually overlay
> the road geometry on it, make it clickable etc., same way Google
> Street View shows 3d lines for roads on the panoramas.
>  * knowing that road A in TIGER crosses roads B, C and D, you can do
> sanity checks if the same ways cross each other in OSM, that may be
> helpful both to the tiger maintainers and to OSM.  Same way you can
> check if a junction has the right number of roads meeting there.
>  * you can provide routing in one area using map A, and seemlessly
> switch to map B when you cross some border and based on some other
> critera.  In effect you can generate a single route using multiple
> maps, you can mix and match in any ways you like.

I don't think you understand how the TLIDs are stored in OSM. They
were never one TLID per way; the initial import joined a bunch of
adjacent ways and concatenated the TLIDs.

_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to