On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Phil! Gold <phi...@pobox.com> wrote: > First was just how route information should be represented. Almost > everyone agreed on two things: that route shields should be rendered with > network-appropriate shield shapes, not the textual prefixes we have now; > and route relations are the best source of route information. (NE2 was > the sole dissenter on the last point; he feels that route relations are > too easily broken.)
My main point was that relations should not be the sole source; refs on ways should be kept for redundancy. But I have no objection to relations being the primary source for the renderers. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
