On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Ian Dees <ian.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Richard Welty <rwe...@averillpark.net> >> wrote: >> > i concur, the NHS tagging should be done as route relations. >> >> They don't work as relations, since they're not always routes that can >> be followed from start to end. >> > Then create a new relation that contains the ways that are part of the > system?
Wouldn't this be using a relation as a category? I would be willing to change the numbered high-priority corridors to relations, but they won't be strictly routes (then again neither are some state highways that have gaps or spurs). _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us