So if a motorway became sub-standard through a small city with a low speed limit, but still limited access, you think tagging it as secondary or tertiary would be appropriate? Seems to me that it's functioning as a motorway regardless of the speed limit. I-93 is a pathological case, and since it doesn't even maintain 4 lanes, I'd argue that it should be tagged trunk in that case. US-78 through tupelo is a case where dropping below motorway wouldn't make sense, as it maintains grade separation and all other aspects of a motorway except shoulder width and a lower than expected speed limit. ----- Original message ----- > On 1/1/11 5:47 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > > Question: what do people think about minimum standards for tagging > > something highway=motorway? In other words, would it be reasonable to > > tag a highway as trunk rather than motorway because it has no > > shoulders or a low speed limit (40 mph)? > with the low limit, it might even be sub-trunk. > > richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
