On 2/5/2011 10:44 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > On 02/04/2011 01:42 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: >> On 2/3/2011 11:15 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: >>> underlying ways >>> often have refs that belong to them (like bridge numbers) but not the >>> route itself. >> You've said this a number of times without explanation. Why does the >> bridge number, or ODOT's internal referencing, "belong" to the way, >> while the route number doesn't? > > Oregon considers highway numbers and route numbers differently.
I know. So what would you do on a bridge on a route, which has both a bridge number and a route number?
> >>> Bike boulevards are on the same network as each other (well, the >>> Portland ones, are, at any rate; note I'm not referring to official >>> routes for state highways like 99 or federal highways like 205 or 84 >>> since you're talking about city bike boulevards). >> >> Speaking of this, I don't think it's appropriate to mark the cycleways >> that parallel I-84 and I-205 as ncn just because they parallel highways >> on the national motor network. > > Never mind Oregon gets federal dollars to maintain those third roadways > for those federal ways, eh? What does this have to do with anything? _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
