Hi Ben (and others),

Sorry I haven't commented on the conversion until now.  Life intervened. In 
general the conversion looks good.  One slightly important thing I noticed is 
that there are no names on any of the objects.

James

On Friday, August 26, 2011 12:14:44 AM Ben Supnik wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> 
> On 8/21/11 10:40 AM, Ben Miller wrote:
> > Great! Thanks Ben.
> > 
> > I downloaded the data for the two areas that I'm interested in
> > (04060104 and 04060105) and stuck them in JOSM. I'm not sure I feel
> > comfortable just dumping the whole thing in (especially if it might
> > cause problems) so I was planning on doing it more or less item by
> > item. Is there a flaw in that plan?
> 
> I don't think so...my hope was to get the data into a form editors could
> use, not to promote bulk importing; in some cases some but not all of
> the water data for a region may already be present from hand-mapping or
> other data sources, so merging is necessary.
> 
> > Also, is there an explanation somewhere of what the various files
> > represent? XXX_nhdarhi0.xml, XXX_nhdflh0.xml, etc.
> 
> The names come right off of the NHD shapefile export.
> 
> http://nhd.usgs.gov/documentation.html
> 
> (That stuff gets pretty terrifying pretty quickly.  Basically the data
> is partitioned by data quality and topology type, so nhdarhi is NHD
> area, highest res data, fl is flow lines, etc.  The files are broken
> into sequence within a HUC to avoid any one file being too huge.
> 
> > And one question about methodology: There are a few larger lakes that
> > were added as part of the PGS process. They appear to have been left
> > pretty much untouched (except by me) and the NHD data is
> > significantly more accurate. Would it be acceptable to replace the
> > PGS ways with NHD ways, assuming I make sure to connect up any
> > rivers, add them to appropriate relations, etc?
> 
> I can't comment on that - I'm not sure there is really a single "right
> thing" to do for OSM; others may at least have better informed opinions
> than I do. :-)
> 
> cheers
> ben
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us



_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to