On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Bill Ricker <bill.n1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Waste/Submerged would be correct status in 1960 prior to Disney > development, not current status. Sounds like that website is not current > source for Reedy Creek documents.
By the way, the particular parcel of land being referred to *is* undeveloped, except for the highway. (http://paarcgis.ocpafl.org/Webmap4/default.aspx?pin=282417000000017) _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
