I'd suggest you copy o...@mapquest.com to further replies on this thread. As for consistency, perhaps adding alternate tags is a possible solution. Messy and redundant, but, yes, consistency for styling, routing, etc will continue to be an issue if ground truth is considered authoritative, and it's allowed to be effectively free-form. It is not my intention to start a large debate on this thread, nut this does need to addressed.
Best, On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/8/2012 3:03 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Nathan Edgars II<nerou...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Yes, but when a local insists on tagging it one way, what's one to do? >>> >> >> Let 'em know about consistency. Whenever practical, we should try to >> be as globally consistent as possible, if for no other reason than >> being able to document things consistently and to not break data >> consumers with overly baroque exceptions. >> > > That's a non-answer when anyone can claim "ground truth" and ignore > consistency. > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-us<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us> > -- John Novak Novacell Technologies and the Old Topo Depot http://www.novacell.com 585-OLD-TOPOS (585-653-8676)
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
