Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/4/2012 12:14 PM, Craig Hinners wrote: > > Nathan Edgars II<nerou...@gmail.com>: > >> It seems that many people see the network tag as not representing a > >> network but a shield design. Does this sound accurate? > > > > No, because, where shield designs differ by agency for the same > logical > > network classification, the network tag does not change, despite the > > differing shields. > > > > One of many examples: Maryland uses a unique green-on-white shield > for > > US Business routes, but those roads still get tagged as > > "network=US:US:Business", not "network=US:US:Business:MD" or > somesuch. > > The renderer would have to detect which agency the road is "in", and > > render the agency-specific shield accordingly. > > So your belief is that there is such a thing as a "U.S. Highway > Business" network, despite AASHTO considering business routes to be > part > of the main U.S. Highway network? > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
You just answered your own question. The business routes are part of the main U.S. highway network, rather than making up a separate "U.S. Highway Business" network. -- John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com "Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
