* Craig Hinners <cr...@hinnerspace.com> [2012-04-08 07:07 -0700]: > Phil! Gold <phi...@pobox.com>: > > It seems to me that network=US:US:Business:MD is the logical extension of > > a scheme that has US:US and US:US:Business. > > My initial reaction is that this goes too far in mixing geographic, > classification, and rendering concepts, which has a bad smell
I plan on experimenting with basing some rendering decisions on the is_in tag, which should work for Maryland's US business routes (assuming it works at all; is_in values aren't really standardized). >From what I've read, all US highways in California should get similar treatment, in that they're signed with different shields than the standard ones. Are there other regional sign variants for broader road networks in the US (or elsewhere)? -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody else has thought. -- Albert Szent-Gyoergi ---- --- -- _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
