On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 03:52:35PM -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On 4/12/2012 2:59 PM, Phil! Gold wrote: > >* Minh Nguyen<m...@1ec5.org> [2012-04-12 10:06 -0700]: > >>There's an ALT I-75 that needs its own sequence file > > > >I had no idea there were alternate Interstates. I added it under > >network=US:I:Alternate, ref=75. (Right now, it's rendering as regular > >I-75.) > > Sounds like a bug in the rendering. > > > However, I wouldn't necessarily oppose a separate network tag in > this case, since it's clearly not part of the Interstate Highway > System. (The same would apply to business Interstates.) > > Michigan has some 'emergency' Interstates that are essentially > detours, but are permanently signed: > http://www.stopandgo.org/gallery/trafficsigns/Emergency_plaque.html
Yeah, those are odd. What the description on that page fails to mention is that I-94 also passes by the Cook Nuclear Power Plant at Bridgman, so it's not just snow MDOT is worried about :-) -- Kristian M Zoerhoff _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
