I muse whether "Federally Funded Research and Development Centers"
(FFRDCs) are amenable to either "landuse=military" or something like
it. I'm not proposing a vote because this may be peculiarly
USA-centric. (Then again, maybe it isn't, as there may very well be
similar entities in other countries).
Looking at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federally_Funded_Research_and_Development_Center
we see that for each of these, there is an Administrator (such as
RAND Corporation, MITRE, Associated Universities, Inc. or University
of California) consisting of private corporations, and both private
and public universities, as well a Sponsor, which is a much shorter
list consisting largely of Department of Energy, Department of
Defense, Department of Homeland Security, Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, NASA (supposed to be civilian), and National Science
Foundation (and that's about it, unless you get more specific within
DoD, like "Department of the Army").
Indeed, this wikipedia article quotes a source of "Congressional
Research Service: 'The Quasi Government: Hybrid Organizations with
Both Government and Private Sector Legal Characteristics.'" And so,
these hybrid or quasi-government/military/private sector/(sometimes)
public university entities do more often than not fit the definition
of "landuse=military" which is "for tagging land areas owned/used by
the military for whatever purpose."
Notwithstanding the Military page in the wiki which states "exercise
caution and know your rights related to mapping military facilities,"
I do wonder whether we may want to extend some of the "military=*"
tags (airfield, barracks, bunker, range...) to include these areas.
Maybe "military=research_facility" with this rendering into a
concomitant red-hatched area in mapnik/standard?
This was initiated by noticing that Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratories
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=37.6881587505341&lon=-121.704912185669&zoom=15)
is a "hole" with respect to landuse around the rest of the City of
Livermore, California. This particular facility is administered by
the University of California (but clearly is not landuse=university)
and sponsored by the Department of Energy, which as a national,
cabinet-level department, is largely concerned with nuclear weapons
and reactors, radioactive waste and domestic energy. Nuclear fusion
(and perhaps weapons) research are being researched at this
particular facility, so at least "landuse=industrial" is correct.
But is some flavor of "military" more precise, or not?
SteveA
California
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
