On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 3:18 PM, KerryIrons <irons54vor...@sbcglobal.net>wrote:
> So Paul, what you really want is advocacy mapping. Not mapping reality > but mapping what you want to have. It comes as a great surprise to me that > this is what OSM is all about. Do you think this is the consensus of the > OSM community? I thought OSM’s goal was to “accurately describe the world” > but you are saying it is also advocacy. No, that's not what I'm advocating, and honestly, the way you're approaching this now, I really have to be wondering if you're being deliberately obtuse. Because if that's actually where you're coming from, you're essentially saying that the USBR system is a pipe dream. I'm not ready to buy that argument because the premise is fundamentally flawed on a level amounting to argumentum ad absurdum.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
