Hi Some guesses :-)
1. node, ref=xxx 2. node, addr:housenumber 3. node, place=locality, name=xxx 4. node, tourism=camp_site, name=xxx http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/?key=tourism&value=camp_site#combinations Try using turbo overpass (http://overpass-turbo.eu/) , and look for campsites over large areas (perhaps in Europe), and see what people are doing. Let us know what you find! Jason On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Tod Fitch <t...@fitchdesign.com> wrote: > re: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=34.81433&lon=-119.1004&zoom=17&layers=M > > Back in November of 2010 AM909 mapped much of the McGill > campground using amenity=parking and ref=SiteNumber to show > individual campsites. See, for example > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/988132518/history > > This seems wrong to me. About like mapping each driveway > in a subdivision with a parking icon. However I have not > found a better solution on the wiki nor by searching taginfo. > The closest I've come is this discussion on the talk-ca > archives: > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2010-August/003211.html > > with an example at > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/5500386 > > I like the idea of using addr:housenumber=SiteNumber but the > use of addr:city=CampgroundName as well as > addr:street=CampgroundName seems suspect to me. I think this > was done so that the location could be searched for using > geographic queries, but isn't that a bit like "tagging for > the renderer"? > > What would be the best practice for this in the US? > > Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us