Toby, thank you very much for that clarification. I see the ito
admin map does not respect relations at the city level but couldn't
really prove it and/or got befuddled at the county level. Seeing the
itoworld rendering at the California/Arizona/Mexico border really
stymied me until I understood this.
Now, is there a method (as neat and easy as using itoworld) that
renders both ways and relations? I mean for admin_levels,
especially, as they are a handy visual for breaking up this large-ish
"talk-us" of ours into between 3000 and 4000 counties, and along with
50 states, those are decent chunks to consider when slicing up these
great states and nation of ours. We've got lots of mapping to
wrangle here!
Tod, please consider this by a roundabout way of answering your
private missive.
Trying to carve elephants into pieces which approach bite-sized (a
terrible metaphor, really, but there it is),
SteveA
California
That ITO map seems to be only looking at ways. If you include
relations in the analysis things should actually be pretty good.
There should be a (mostly) correct boundary relation for every
county in the US. At one point I was the last user to have touched
about 40% of them... There may very well be some cleanup with
state/city borders that overlap. I thought I got most of the state
ones although I may have missed some out east.
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
