On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Greg Morgan <dr.kludge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > The work flow that you mention drive me batty.[0] At one time there was a > discussion on the list about moving exit_to tags as destination tags on the > ramp. I moved most of the exit_to tags that I mapped to the ramps. Here > you are proposing something different by leaving some exit_to tags and > adding destination tags occasionally. The batty part, is that the original > way I mapped these without exit_to was what I found in Europe. It looks > like Paul has a point because junction:ref is in the wiki page > that Duane cites. I don't know that you can use "does not look like the x > tagging > scheme is very common" or "we will continue to follow the conventional > tagging" when the wiki page has changes as recent as 9/2015. > > Plus Osmand consumes the ramp tagging, not the node tagging (and in no small part because it's not obvious which direction the node means if you're a machine). Most of the interstates (soon, all) will have both. Though Osmand doesn't use motorway junction refs or the way's junction:ref (yet). That said, yes, destination has legs. http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/destination#map Junction:ref=* is getting there. http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/junction%3Aref#map And here's a control with highway=motorway_link http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/highway=motorway_link#map Seems with the more flexible tagging (junction:ref=* and destination=*) there's a strong correlation between regions with the strongest car culture (Route 66, New England and Germany) and where it's being tagged.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
