> On Mar 22, 2017, at 4:59 AM, Ian Dees <ian.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 22, 2017 7:49 AM, "Paul Johnson" <ba...@ursamundi.org > <mailto:ba...@ursamundi.org>> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:33 AM, Eric Ladner <eric.lad...@gmail.com > <mailto:eric.lad...@gmail.com>> wrote: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/33.74152/-116.29677 > <http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/33.74152/-116.29677> > > So much wrongness.. I don't even know where to start in describing it. > > This really "feels" like a botched import that has the potential to become > something actually good. I've reached out. > http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38292137 > <http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38292137> > > I noticed this yesterday when working on broken relations... It doesn't look > like an import (mostly because they used iD and the digitization looks like > hand drawn iD) but the tagging doesn't look right. I'd say it's a mapping > project (they called it a "draw party") with good intentions but that might > need some tagging cleanup.
At least the stuff I first notice looking at that in JOSM (highway=* drawn as polygons without an area tag and also including a landuse=residential) are from single commits from a mapper that was active for several months a few years ago. Change set claims source is Bing. Sounds like a well meaning but flawed contribution by a new mapper who has now moved on from OSM.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
