On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Tod Fitch <t...@fitchdesign.com> wrote:
> > > On Oct 5, 2017, at 8:05 PM, Richie Kennedy <richiekenned...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I *strongly* dispute Paul's assertion that a highway that has fully > > controlled access but is single carriageway should be "trunk" instead > > of "motorway." Access control, not number of lanes, should be the > > primary guidance behind a motorway or trunk classification. > > A two lane (one lane each way, probably undivided) limited access (with > interchanges) is, I believe, called a “super two” and the wiki calls for > that to be tagged as trunk. [1] > Limited access just means few intersections or driveways. Controlled access would be interchange exclusive. > Not sure how long that has been in the wiki, but it has been at least a > couple of years as I used that guidance in tagging a “super two” in the > Sierra Nevada foothills several years ago. > Correct, I believe a super-2 is a good qualification to be a trunk, not a motorway. While they might have a lot of freeway-like features and offer freeway speeds, few people would typically consider them a freeway.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us