On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Richie Kennedy <richiekenned...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Greg Troxel <g...@lexort.com> wrote: > > > > I'm with Paul here. To be motorway, there are three critical > > characteristics: > > > > divided > > >=2 lanes each direction (so passing is possible) > > limited access > > > > If those aren't all true, then it just isn't a motorway. (I gather > > there is a road in Alaska labeled Interstate that doesn't meet all > > those, and I don't mind if the locals want to make an exception. But if > > it isn't signed I-, then I don't think there should be exceptions.) > > > > Perhaps I should make it clear that I am willing to pull a **full NE2 > defense** of the position that a controlled-access Super 2 is properly > tagged as motorway. So far, it does appear that you are in the minority opinion on this, as was NE2. > I will also share publically what I have already > shared with Paul privately: changing the tag on segments of controlled > access Super 2 in my area of knowledge in my local area is an > invitation to an edit war. > That's entirely on you at this point, I edit in good faith.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
