There is a talk-us-massachusetts@ and I think review of your proposed mechanical edit should include that list.
I suspect people would be amenable, but it would be good to publish the code, and the proposed files to upload, so that they can be reviewed. (I'm not clear on the rules for mechanical edits; I'm just asking for that as a local who is not comfortable with non-trivial mechanical edits without published code.) Also, it certainly makes sense that there are some values that are hard to parse. The obvious approach is to just leave them out (and leave them for manual fixing or another day), but I'm not really sure exactly what you are proposing to do. As for nodes with both the old addr tag and new ones, you imply that the simplest way is to clean them up before a mechanical edit. But that implies that if they aren't fixed first, you might do something to those nodes, and that seems against the spirit of the mechanical edit policy, which involves refraining from changes that you can't basically prove are correct. But I don't expect you'd be doing that, so perhaps you can expand on what you meant. Greg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
