I'm referring to when ref tagging on a way, which yes, is dinosaur tagging obsoleted the moment route relations became a thing. On a relation, I could go either way on the relation being named, network would be US:MS:Clarke and the ref would be 123 in this example.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018, 14:08 Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 2:35 PM Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > > > > Just ref=CR 123. The name should not be redundant to the ref, so if > it's signed as Clark Co. 123 and that's it, then add noname=yes as well. > The name is only the name, name is not ref. > > I'm fine with an unnamed way having just a ref - I can go either way > on that one - but please don't do a ref without a network! (And please > put ref and network on a relation, so that people developing shield > rendering code stay sane.) >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
