Mike N. wrote:
> This is a proposed import of road centerlines for Spartanburg County
> SC, based on county GIS data. This will include a systematic review of
> all roads in the county and qualify to remove tiger:reviewed tags.
Looks good!
Browsing through the code and the wiki page, you have:
> else:
> if hwy != '':
> print ('Unknown highway type: ', hwy)
> tags['highway'] = 'residential'
and
> Add surface type as paved if it appears paved in imagery.
Could I suggest that you act cautiously wrt the tiger:reviewed tag in these
two cases?
If it's an "unknown highway type" it should probably remain as
tiger:reviewed=no. Likewise, if the surface isn't clear, then either
tiger:reviewed should continue to be =no, or there should be some other
tagging to indicate this (surface=unknown, or surface:reviewed=no, or
something).
cheers
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/USA-f5284732.html
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
