Mike N. wrote:
> As one who grew up in a rural area, a country road lined with 4 
> houses in a mile would feel "residential" and I would tend to set 
> it as residential in OSM.   That describes most of the rural parts 
> of this county also, except for roads that don't happen to have 
> a house.

Absolutely, not disputing that - it's simply that tiger:reviewed=no is a
good signifier that "the surface type on this road might not be what you'd
expect", and for developed countries that's traditionally a paved surface
for residential roads. As long as there's some way of discerning that, I'm
happy.

cheers
Richard



--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/USA-f5284732.html

_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to