>
>  If you drive into a checkerboard
> area of private/public land, there are no Forest Service signs at the
> limits of private land.
>

In my neck of the woods, USFS owned land is signed fairly frequently with
small yellow property markers at the boundaries.

Privately owned land within a NF declared boundary is not under any
protection by the USFS, therefore tagging the administrative boundary as
'protected_area' will lead to inaccuracies. The land areas that are
actually protected from development/have active resource management are
only the lands which the federal government owns within these
administrative boundaries.

I think using the administrative boundaries is a good & practical first
approximation, but the goal should eventually to be to change over to the
actual land owned by the Fed and operated for conservation by the USFS.

>
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to