I prefer Oracle to win. Then, Google would be forced to dump Java and
find replacement.
On 4/6/21 1:06 PM, Russell Reiter via talk wrote:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021, 12:31 PM D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk,
<talk@gtalug.org <mailto:talk@gtalug.org>> wrote:
Oracle sued Google, claiming Android infringed Oracle's patents on
Java.
Somehow. That failed.
So they sued for copyright infringement based on the copying of
the API
declarations.
The computer community had been very scared that APIs could be
copyrighted, something nobody had expected.
The US Supreme Court decided that this particular case came under
"fair
use". and was no infringement. This was NOT a general decision about
APIs.
This is very good news of Free Software. And consumers.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20210405/09243546552/supreme-court-sides-with-google-decade-long-fight-over-api-copyright-googles-copying-java-api-is-fair-use.shtml
I read that article with interest after I had used a
pharmacological/health sciences metaphore about copyright in another
thread. This description of how the courts view a value added
proposition, is closer to the crucible of linux topicality, but the
principal is the same.
Shame on Oracle for not sharing what they conceptually borrowed
elsewhere for their product.
You may use other copy protected work under fair use if it adds value
to the proposition. I think this decision makes that pretty clear.
---
Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org <mailto:talk@gtalug.org>
Unsubscribe from this mailing list
https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
---
Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org
Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
---
Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org
Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
