On 4/6/21 2:17 PM, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote:
| From: Russell Reiter via talk <talk@gtalug.org> | | I read that article with interest after I had used a pharmacological/health | sciences metaphore about copyright in another thread. Most drugs are "protected" by patent legislation. Very different from copyright. Perhaps surprisingly, trademark law is very helpful to drug companies because what something is called may matter more than what it is.
Yes one of my family members stated this about aspirin after working at Bayer. They stated the cost was basically 3 to 4 times the regular non traded medicine even through it was the same. Most people still bought aspirin through. Happens all the time with other medicines as well.
| You may use other copy protected work under fair use if it adds value to | the proposition. I think this decision makes that pretty clear. There are a few tests for US Fair Use. Do you think that "transformative" is the same as you meant by "adds value"? <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformation_(law)>
I'm not a lawyer but to my knowledge there can be overlap. It really comes now to content again. For APIs the content is clearly no but perhaps in other cases it is. For example, translations add value but are considered transformative in nature. Content in the legal system is always critical. Nick
--- Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
--- Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk