On 10/13/07, Jeff Siegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thought this might be of interest. > > "I spent two years trying to make Rails do something it wasn't meant to do, > then realized my old abandoned language (PHP, in my case) would do just fine > if approached with my new Rails-gained wisdom." > > See: > http://www.oreillynet.com/ruby/blog/2007/09/7_reasons_i_switched_back_to_p_1 > .html
The comments perhaps are more informative than the article was, as he barely explained anything in any meaningful detail. Other than "I tried to do a PHP site in Rails the PHP way, and it sucked." there's *very* little information in this article. Perhaps the most amusing was the vi-vs-emacs style debate that raged for about a week. Personally I see each with their own strengths, and prefer to make software with the right tool for the job (the old hammer/drill saying applies here). However, I can agree with one sentiment that the author has - working in Rails has made me a better PHP developer, with better application design and semantics. And PHP has the flexibility for me to go beyond that world, whether that is good or bad is up for debate though *laugh* -- Mitch _______________________________________________ New York PHP Community Talk Mailing List http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk NYPHPCon 2006 Presentations Online http://www.nyphpcon.com Show Your Participation in New York PHP http://www.nyphp.org/show_participation.php
