Peter: as one of those well educated, intelligent people - I actually do resent 
this sweeping generalisation.

Some of us did actually draw the correct conclusions based on evidence through 
VFO press releases, lack of official comment and so forth. Others wanted 
somehting more definite than circumstantial stuff.   Unlike many on the list - 
some of us took steps to get official news. VFO clearly had to come to a 
solution to a range of issues affecting the viability of Window-eyes. The offer 
which many of us have already taken up will have details behind it which 
ordinary people llike you and I will never know.

  The list is a means whereby people exercise freedom of expression, but it is 
genuinely unhelpful to be smug.  And even without digging too far, those who 
were less certain than you and I still had opinions based on what they believed 
to be so.

Please do not start this sort of thread again?

People have quickly moved on.

Vaughan.



-----Original Message-----
From: Talk 
[mailto:talk-bounces+vaughan.dodd001=msd.govt...@lists.window-eyes.com] On 
Behalf Of Peter Duran via Talk
Sent: Wednesday, 17 May 2017 4:09 p.m.
To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Subject: I told you, Window-Eyes is Dead!

Well, now all of you officially know that Window-Eyes is really dead!  But, why 
couldn't most of  you (mostly well-educated and intelligent) folks figure that 
out for yourselves?

That is  by no means a silly question.  Analysis of news stories, by 
independent researchers, over the past 6 months reveal that smart people as 
well as stupid people embrace "fake news" with equal relish.  Why is that?

Also, lots of folks still believe that President Trump is "doing a good job" in 
spite of the fact that nothing has been really accomplished so far and that 
Trump apparently has no clue about the facts at hand.

It is an intriguing question, pondered by sociologists, why approximately half 
of the population, in any given community at any given time, will believe 
"crazy stuff" if asserted by a "figure of authority".

Peter Duran





_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/vaughan.dodd001%40msd.govt.nz.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

-------------------------------
This email and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and 
subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, 
dissemination, distribution or duplication of this email and attachments is 
prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the author 
immediately and erase all copies of the email and attachments. The Ministry of 
Social Development accepts no responsibility for changes made to this message 
or attachments after transmission from the Ministry.

-------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

Reply via email to