I've been a WE user for about 15 years.  before that I had enough sight to use 
a computer without a screen reader. I tried JAWS and WE demos and at that time 
found that Window Eyes was much easier, navigation was more logical to me than 
JAWS. I plan to keep using WE as long as I can and I'm going to install JAWS 
and see if I can learn it while still using WE.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Kevin Huber via Talk 
  To: Charles Adkins ; Window-Eyes Discussion List 
  Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 9:44 AM
  Subject: Re: jaws observations.


  Hi Charles:

  It is interesting that you say Window-eyes is more intuitive.  Of
  course, I tend to agree with you after Window-eyes has been my main
  screen reader for fifteen years, but I have heard several longtime
  JAWS users say that JAWS is more intuitive than Woindow-eyes, so the
  word intuiitive is a relative term I guess.

  Kevin Huber


  On 5/22/17, Charles Adkins via Talk <talk@lists.window-eyes.com> wrote:
  > Well, using my dectalk usb I can't seem to figure out how to change the
  > voice pitch and Jaws doesn't seem as responsive as we. I do also miss some
  > of the features. I haven't found Jaws to be as intuitive as we but its only
  > been a week for me and I keep going back to we after my fustration.
  >
  > Sent from my iPhone
  >
  >> On May 22, 2017, at 6:36 AM, michaels mail via Talk
  >> <talk@lists.window-eyes.com> wrote:
  >>
  >> Hi guys how are people going with Jaws has anybody had any mager probems
  >> yet.
  >> Has Jaws crashed in any way so far.
  >> I find jaws quiet stable so far.
  >> I use to have WE just stop talking in WLM and IE WE would always start
  >> again with the hot key.
  >> The only thing i miss some of the WE features.
  >> Cheers Michael.
  >> _______________________________________________
  >> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
  >> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
  >>
  >> For membership options, visit
  >> 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/cadkins6739%40gmail.com.
  >> For subscription options, visit
  >> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
  >> List archives can be found at
  >> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
  > _______________________________________________
  > Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author
  > and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
  >
  > For membership options, visit
  > 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/huber.kevin7%40gmail.com.
  > For subscription options, visit
  > http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
  > List archives can be found at
  > http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
  >
  _______________________________________________
  Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

  For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/loyrg2845%40gmail.com.
  For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
  List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

Reply via email to