Yeah so we need to figure out the mapping, that's sorta my main problem, as for hosting, massdot is already hosting it and would continue to host it with you guys free to cache it as much as you want.
>-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ciprian Manea >Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 3:52 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [OAM-talk] quick recap, OAM infra > >Hi, > >Just to recap > >@Calvin, OAM could use your dataset - TBs of (oblique) imagery, >currently stored as jpeg(?), but it's a bit unclear at the moment how >the imagery is (going to be) mapped to geo/coordinates. Assuming we're >going to solve this part, is there any chance to host the data >@massdot and feed it via http to a caching system at @OAM before it >gets delivered to the internets? > >On the other hand, there's still no news regarding the OAM infra (I >don't think I've seen many past pointers on talk@ regarding its >existence; just double checking). Any takers/helpers? > >btw: who takes care of the OAM wiki/www page? Can I have my own wiki >account please? :-) > >ping @schuyler, @chris > > >Thanks, >Ciprian >---- A* > >On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Metcalf, Calvin (DOT) ><[email protected]> wrote: >> Yeah if you change the extention to jpeg you can view it, >other things came up before i was able to totally figure it >out but i think there is a shapefile grid for it somewhere >> Sent with Verizon Mobile Email >> >> >> ---Original Message--- >> From: "Jim Klassen" <[email protected]> >> Sent: 10/8/2011 7:07 pm >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected], [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [OAM-talk] Hi >> >> >> At a previous job we ended up selecting vendors based on >their willingness to provide us the data in an open format. (We already had a viewer that allowed users to access photos >from many sources, from a selection of big collection >contracts to ad-hoc shots, into the viewer. So a viewer was >tied to one dataset or vendor wasn't appropiate.) >> >> If you have what I think you have, getting the imagery into >an open format isn't too bad; getting the geo-referencing data >to go with the images is quite the challenge. >> >> On Oct 8, 2011, at 15:17, "Metcalf, Calvin (DOT)" ><[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Yeah and we at massdot still have a couple terrabytes of >obliques (the same ones used in bing) that we own and would >love to liberate from their wierd pictometry format >>> Sent with Verizon Mobile Email >>> >>> >>> ---Original Message--- >>> From: "Ciprian Manea" <[email protected]> >>> Sent: 10/8/2011 5:57 am >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [OAM-talk] Hi >>> >>> Hi there, >>> >>> The list is quite silent these day :-|, but I might have a few spare >>> "cycles" as sysadmin if needed. Btw: what's the latest status with >>> the current OAM architecture, deployments, active/available >datasets? >>> >>> @Jim, how much data and what areas do you have in mind? >(another topic >>> might be the licensing, is it PD/public already?) >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Ciprian >>> ---- A* >>> >>> >>> Hi. >>> >>> I have been talking to people at FOSS4G about Open Aerial Map and >>> would like to get involved in the project. I have a few ortho-photo >>> datasets that I need to publish and I figure I might as >well do so in >>> a way that supports a broader goal. >>> >>> Jim Klassen >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> talk mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> >http://host134.hostmonster.com/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org >>> _______________________________________________ >>> talk mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> >http://host134.hostmonster.com/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org >> > >_______________________________________________ >talk mailing list >[email protected] >http://host134.hostmonster.com/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://host134.hostmonster.com/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org
