Frederik Ramm schrieb: > Hi, > >> What about moving proposals not actively worked upon to a new >> inactive_proposals page (or simply to the rejected features page)? >> > By the way, who has come up with these rejected/approved features > pages? Don't know. > I don't like that too much - reminds me of the little > "approved" symbols that were once on the Map Features page and which > got removed because we didn't want to create the impression that the > non-approved tags were somehow less worthy than the approved ones. So > what's the story behind that? Are we sure we want this? > Well, I'm sure I want this. Just to keep track when things was approved / rejected and alike. > Also, the "rejected features" page carries a line saying "... are not > recommended to be used..." - I'm tempted to change this to say > something like "you're free to use these if you want but it it > suggested that you read what people had to say against them when they > were discussed". > Well, that's because the term "not recommended" is used I guess. If someone would ask me if it's a pretty good idea to use any of those tags I would not recommend it. I've added a short explanation to the page why it's probably not a good idea to use those tags.
I've changed the "header" of that page a bit, e.g. links to related pages were missing. Regards, ULFL _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
