Dermot McNally wrote: > My favourite suggestion so far is that a second key be introduced - > either for the "original" measurement (my favourite, since it retains > the traditional meaning of the existing key) or for the normalised > equivalent. > This is what I was thinking all along. On the one hand you want the info as it is indicated in situ. On the other hand you want to be able to parse it efficiently. A second field seems like the most obvious solution. Maybe name spaced: maxheight:imperial = 3 ft.
Polyglot _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
