On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Steve Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Dave Stubbs wrote:
>
>
> > It would probably have a tag like man_made=fishpond. I don't know
> > there's a tagging schema for that.
> >
>
>  How did you know that the man_made tag defined the context?
>

Oh for fuck's sake. Because I've got half a brain -- that's the point.
If I didn't have half a brain then it would be because someone told
me. And if neither was true then I wouldn't know, but it also wouldn't
actually matter. And the namespace wouldn't help anyway unless I
happened to know it was a namespace, and as I clearly didn't actually
know what the object was in the first place this is just a meaningless
string to me.

>
>
> > Seriously, I've had enough of this.
> >
>
>  That's fine, but I'm afraid you haven't convinced me to change my position:
> name spaces are a Good Thing, and I'm clearly not alone in this belief.

a Good Thing, but you can't tell me why, and you ignore my reasons why not.
This is the problem dude, you don't get why you're doing it. You have
faith in the Great Goodness of Namespaces and refuse to question why.
I was clearly right with the kitten analogy.

I like to know why I'm doing something, and dislike being told "because".
So far you've not actually come up with anything except statements of
belief, and a few potential non-uses.

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to