Shaun McDonald wrote: > It is a special kind of bridge that is usually longer than the normal > bridge.
So it has longer sides in the rendering... > There is often some historical interest related to it. It may > even be a tourist attraction. Both of these things can be true of normal bridges, and there are various tags and additional icons which can be used in those cases. My question is: why does a viaduct need a different rendering *just because it's a viaduct*? I've not seen generalist maps which differentiate. Gerv _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk