The wording of the main/first data source never filled me with confidence either:
"There is currently some question as to the licensing terms for this data. This is being resolved as quickly as possible. Until then, it is best to assume that this imagery can not be used outside of OpenAerialMap." http://openaerialmap.hypercube.telascience.org/datasource/1/ Doesn't feel to me like a confident, unambigious, "free to use in OSM" phrase. Cheers, Andy On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:36 PM, SteveC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I discovered that people are just rectifying using google aerial and > stuff, which breaks our paranoid/cautious stance on accepting > copyright derived work. > > On 21 May 2008, at 21:55, Tomáš Tichý wrote: > >> What happened to Openaerialmap layer in Potlatch? I see only --------- >> signs on the place where it was in menu. >> >> Tomas Tichy >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> talk@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk >> > > Best > > Steve > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
