On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 19:54 +0200, Cartinus wrote: > Here in Utrecht I have drawn a building with a "courtyard". The inner > polygon > does not have any tags. > * The hole shows OK in [EMAIL PROTECTED]/Osmarender > http://tile.openstreetmap.nl/?zoom=17&lat=52.08396&lon=5.10485&layers=000000BF > * The hole does not show in the osm2pgsql/Mapnik generated tiles from > openstreetmap.org. > http://tile.openstreetmap.nl/?zoom=17&lat=52.08396&lon=5.10485&layers=00000B0F > * The hole shows OK in the osm2pgsql/Mapnik generated tiles from > openstreetmap.nl. > http://tile.openstreetmap.nl/?zoom=17&lat=52.08396&lon=5.10485&layers=B000000F > > I think openstreetmap.nl uses a newer version of osm2pgsql than the > main site. > If that is true than it is just a question of time till multipolygons > defined > as per wiki description will show OK on the main site too.
I believe the sites are both using very similar code (unless Kleptog has some private changes for the NL site). I think the difference may be due to the NL site using the "--slim" mode. In this case this is probably allowing it to keep the untagged inner way that would have been discarded in non-slim mode. > A multipolygon with the same tags on inner and outer shows OK at all > three: > http://tile.openstreetmap.nl/?zoom=15&lat=52.05845&lon=5.16772&layers=000000BF > http://tile.openstreetmap.nl/?zoom=15&lat=52.05845&lon=5.16772&layers=00000B0F > http://tile.openstreetmap.nl/?zoom=15&lat=52.05845&lon=5.16772&layers=B000000F > Right, this is normally the best approach. Jon _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
