On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Dave Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Alex Mauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > SteveC wrote: > >> I'd like to define some roads that really don't have a name so that > >> they drop off the noname map. > >> > >> > >> http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~random/no-names/<http://dev.openstreetmap.org/%7Erandom/no-names/> > >> > >> I've been adding noname:yes but I can see that might not be optimal. > >> Maybe name:__none__. Or something. > > > > Sounds overcomplicated to me. If you know something to be correct, just > > ignore the warnings. > > > But how do you tell someone else that it's correct? > If I see there is an unnamed street I may go out of my way to find its > name, only to discover it doesn't have one.... and that about 300 > different people before me have done the same thing. > > Dave > What about borrowing an idea from the TIGER import and have a "reviewed=yes" tag? That would indicate that the information present has been independently checked. This doesn't directly address the "no name" issue but it might prevent 299 unnecessary visits. Karl
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk