On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Karl Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Dave Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Alex Mauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> > Hash: SHA1 >> > >> > SteveC wrote: >> >> I'd like to define some roads that really don't have a name so that >> >> they drop off the noname map. >> >> >> >> http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~random/no-names/ >> >> >> >> I've been adding noname:yes but I can see that might not be optimal. >> >> Maybe name:__none__. Or something. >> > >> > Sounds overcomplicated to me. If you know something to be correct, just >> > ignore the warnings. >> >> >> But how do you tell someone else that it's correct? >> If I see there is an unnamed street I may go out of my way to find its >> name, only to discover it doesn't have one.... and that about 300 >> different people before me have done the same thing. >> >> Dave > > What about borrowing an idea from the TIGER import and have a "reviewed=yes" > tag? That would indicate that the information present has been independently > checked. This doesn't directly address the "no name" issue but it might > prevent 299 unnecessary visits.
Maybe, but you're then asking, "reviewed what/how?". And you're back to specifying that you've reviewed that the road has no name, only probably in a more complicated way. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
