On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Sven Geggus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It's because the Mapnik layer aims to be a nice looking map and not one >> that "has it all". > > Despite of this it would IMO be still much mor appropriate to render > tracktype=grade1 in the same form as highway=service. > > If we don't want to have mapnik render different tracks differently we > should at least have them in the cyclemap!
Meh. It's on my list of things to do, but to be honest I don't see it as very important. There's lots of things that the cycle map doesn't render at all, and for one I see distinguishing onroad/offroad cycle routes as more important than the difference between tracktypes; ditto for distinguishing bicycle=yes/no on footpaths and so on. Cheers, Andy _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
