On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Simon Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, > I have finally gotten around to uploading some of the Calgary Trails > Project data... under the username 'catmp'. I made a slight mod the > converter to remove attribution/RoadID on nodes within a way as this was > making/will make cleaning up of traces difficult. > > I think there is a bug with the POLYGON stuff. Look in the Calgary area > (BOW RIVER polygons), they are mostly right but 'jump' to nodes not in the > original polygon. So it looks like something is up with the 'previously > used' node stuff. > > For example (frigged the name to make it findable in output) > --- > [POLYGON] > Type=0x48 > Label=BLOW RIVER > > Data0=(50.93128,-113.99972),(50.93116,-113.99959),(50.93172,-113.99959),(50.93214,-113.99998),(50.93279,-114.00093),(50.93288,-114.00122),(50.93270,-114.00196),(50.93262,-114.00212),(50.93253,-114.00199),(50.93227,-114.00067),(50.93163,-113.99990),(50.93150,-113.99993) > [END]RoadID=1459 > --- > ends up with nodes > --- > <node id='-1' visible='true' lat='50.93163' lon='-113.9999' /> - yes > <node id='-2' visible='true' lat='50.93227' lon='-114.00067' /> - yes > <node id='-3' visible='true' lat='50.91909' lon='-113.99369' /> - no > comes from RoadID 1458 > <node id='-4' visible='true' lat='50.93262' lon='-114.00212' /> - yes > <node id='-5' visible='true' lat='50.93214' lon='-113.99998' /> - yes > <node id='-6' visible='true' lat='50.93279' lon='-114.00093' /> - yes > <node id='-7' visible='true' lat='50.93116' lon='-113.99959' /> - yes > <node id='-8' visible='true' lat='50.93288' lon='-114.00122' /> - yes > <node id='-9' visible='true' lat='50.9327' lon='-114.00196' /> - yes > <node id='-10' visible='true' lat='50.91991' lon='-113.9935' /> - no > comes from RoadID=1459 > <node id='-11' visible='true' lat='50.92262' lon='-113.99522' /> - no > comes from RoadID=1459 > <node id='-12' visible='true' lat='50.9315' lon='-113.99993' /> - yes > --- > > > > I am not 100% convinced of the tags, apparently the route up Turtle > Mountain is 'bicycle=yes'... this is definately NOT the case!!!! Don't > know whether this is source data problem, or with the parsing of the > garmin attributes. > > Places uploaded: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.5908&lon=-114.4056&zoom=14&layers=B00FT > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.5846&lon=-114.5279&zoom=13&layers=B00FT > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.3548&lon=-114.2812&zoom=13&layers=B00FT > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.0474&lon=-113.9209&zoom=13&layers=B00FT > > (these are revertable/removable quite easily as there are isolated on their > own) > > Way too late to do much more on this tonight (errr.. this morning). Cheers, > Simon. I don't think I did much of anything with the polygon part--I mostly focused on the polylines. I'll look into it but I'm not sure that I'll be able to get to it right away. As for the bicycle=yes, I'll double-check the parsing but I suspect it's a problem with the source data. Part of the issue is that if it's not marked as restricted/forbidden in the .mp file, then I had to assume that meant "yes". Karl
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
