> If my solution isn't good it's not going to be used... I fear it's not true, at first because it is not "not good" ended it is, and answers a need, I would say, it is not as good as it could be. ( sure, no tag will ever be)
And then because if people have nothing better, they will use it <troll>the tracktype feature is IMHO one of the worst feature we have, and still used by thousand of people because it was the only way to go</troll> > If you can spend the time to find good names for the individual option > (and merge say residential-without-name and poi-without-name to noname) > and do all the stuff in the wiki, I'm certainly not opposed to change > the naming in maplint. If we can reach consensus in this way and have > tags which are not only valid for maplint but for your renderer too, > that be really good. Then I am on my way, even if we don't reach the consensus voting number stuff, if we, as validators maintainers, reach a consensus, I'll say we have 50% won. > If it is that scatter? No. But if we had a couple hundreds noname=yes > and tenthousands of $whatever? Maybe it's a kind of trade off, developpers don't want to spend hours discussing, users don't want to spend hours correcting their tags. We just need to find wich is longer -- Sylvain Letuffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] qui suis-je : http://slyserv.dyndns.org _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk