Richard Bullock wrote: > Perhaps Map Features should be for the main core tags only (for newbies > mainly - the basics of how to get their road/feature displayed). Perhaps > we > should limit it to the things we consider important enough to render on > the > main renderers - and we can have other pages for more specialist tagging - > e.g. the properties of these ways.
Definitely. That way people who know about railways can concern themselves with railway tagging, people who know about waterways can concern themselves with canal tagging, and so on. When a tag is proposed that cuts across boundaries (walkers, cyclists and 4x4ers all need to know about bumpy surfaces) it's still pretty easy to co-ordinate efforts between 'groups'. In Wikipedia speak it wouldn't be far off a WikiProject. And we lose the crazy situation where people who don't understand a subject still feel they should vote on its tags. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Map-Features-tp20803946p20809996.html Sent from the OpenStreetMap - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
