On 27 Feb 2009, at 15:05, Chris Hill wrote: > Peter Miller wrote: >> Would it be appropriate to continue this conversation on legal- >> talk? Talk is very busy at the moment and we have a lovely list of >> our own :) >> >> > Emoticon aside, I think the licence is far too important to just > discuss among a cosy few. When I tried to join legal (out of > interest) I could not. >> With regard to these questions, lets make a clear distinction >> between the question (which anyone is qualified to raise) and the >> answer (for which one is likely to need to be a lawyer)! > I don't need to be a lawyer to have an opinion and just because > someone is a lawyer doesn't mean they are right. > > So, is there a succinct summary of the proposals,plans and options?
There are a bunch of wiki pages of varying quality and accuracy that relate to the licence here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Open_Data_Licence Sure, there are also a bunch of unanswered questions and as I am 'on the outside' as well I don't have the answers to them and actually I think the people on the inside are still working on some of them. I suggest that we capture the questions on the 'open issues' wiki page Regards, Peter > > Cheers, Chris _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
