On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Peter Miller <peter.mil...@itoworld.com> wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Peter Miller <peter.mil...@itoworld.com> > Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 22:04:57 +0000 > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] It's all too fast... > To: Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> > > Even now we are getting no explanations from the foundation to our > questions. Either this is because they dont know or it is because they > dont think they need to contribute. I understand that most directors > have not been in the loop so cant contribute.
I really don't want to get into a long discussion about the licence, but what I'm really missing is a rationale document, going through each paragraph explaining why it says what it says. Because there are things in there that I don't understand why they're there. As an aside, Can we get something into the user accounts that allows people to tick a box saying they agree to some kind of licence change. ISTM the easiest way to finish the discussion about deleted data is to get some actual figures as to how much of a problem it is. If it turns out 99.8% of people agree then the question becomes moot. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <klep...@gmail.com> http://svana.org/kleptog/ _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
